A Thought About Stigma

6d8be7883823283e73cd4b91bbc40942The issue of stigma involving mental illness is alive and well, but who is responsible to stop it? How can it be stopped? I’ve been thinking about this a lot. I don’t even know if I am truly convinced that I have the right to say that I am sick when I really truly am sick. Stigma is often self-inflicted, I have come to believe. Not that I am openly stigmatizing myself, or directly and purposefully  perpetuating it, but by allowing myself to be affected by it. By that I mean by allowing myself to feel or believe, whether unconsciously or not, that what is being implied through stigma is truth. For example, I wasn’t able to continue in my last career because I wasn’t able to maintain a depression/manic free state. Sure, it was a good job and I was able to go on medical leave, but ultimately I left the job that I loved because of instability. Why then, in the back of my mind is my default feeling about this that it is my fault and that I couldn’t keep the job because of some personality flaw, or some other flaw that is in my control. Why do I feel like I screwed up and that in reality, didn’t deserve to keep the job. It makes me feel bad. I know intellectually that I was sick, but I can’t feel that it is true. I don’t feel that I have the right to say that I am sick. It has to stop.

This has got me to thinking. While it is important to educate about mental illness, and that will help combat stigmatization against the mentally ill (I personally don’t see the difference between mental and physical illness, but that is a topic for another time. In fact, I did a post related to that here. ), I think it is probably most important that we focus on ourselves . We need to change the language both in general and in the way we are referring to ourselves and our situations. If we are experiencing depression, anxiety, mania, or are referring to a time that we were, we should boldly and unapologetically say that we are or were sick. That we have a brain disorder. The brain is an organ in our physical bodies and there is an imbalance in the chemicals and therefore it’s functioning. The problem is not some abstract condition that we cannot identify. It is a direct result of our brain chemistry, it’s that simple. It is not up for debate. We are sick. Just as a cancer patient is sick and has a physical illness, one of our organs is not functioning properly so we are sick. That’s it.

The fact that the personality is formed by activity in the brain makes it very obvious that if there is an imbalance, and therefore a disruption, in brain function it only makes sense that the personality would be affected. The personality is not a choice. The fact that a person is suffering from extreme irritability during a depressive or manic state does not mean that they are an irritable person. The personality is not the self, in my opinion. The self is our bodies and the personality is a function of that body. We cannot chose it.

Additionally, our brains create and recreate connections all the time. The creation and recreation of the connections, how the brain is “wired”, is affected by our environment. I believe that the environment can contribute to mental illness insofar as a propensity for mental illness exists. It has been shown that some people who have the predisposition of mental illness may or may not develop such, and that outside stimuli, such as trauma or abuse, can trigger the illness. That is not to say that the person is not really sick and that the person can choose to get over the trauma and move on, back to not having a mental illness. They have a mental illness. Someone might have the propensity to develop a certain type of cancer but never become sick, while someone else in the same situation might participate in a lifestyle that increases their chances of developing the illness. That doesn’t mean, that if latter develops cancer,that the cancer isn’t legitimate. The brain is affected by intangible stimuli. Stress might result in stomach aches and headaches or worse, and it can also trigger a disorder in brain function. Mental illness is nothing more than physical illness, it just has a different manifestation. Sick is sick.

Honestly, until we stop trying to change other peoples’ opinions or impressions of mental illness, and start talking boldly, confidently and unashamedly about our illness just as though we have any other illness, I doubt the problem of stigma is going anywhere very quickly. If we own it, speak openly about it, and expect others to accept it like they accept any other serious illness, then eventually they will.


Published by AmysAyes

I am not sure about anything but amazed by everything. I struggle with erratic moods. I don't know if it is a disorder, a gift, or a little bit of both, but I am going to try to embrace them, let myself feel them, and hopefully come out wiser on the other side.

4 thoughts on “A Thought About Stigma

  1. I completely disagree.

    Mental illness isn’t a brain disease. It isn’t like physical illness. It isn’t an illness at all.

    Mental illness is stigma.

    Everyone’s brain is different and everyone behaves differently.
    And everyone suffers.

    It’s just that some kinds of behaviour and some kinds of suffering are designated ‘abnormal’ or ‘defective’ and in our society such things are pathologised medically (as homosexuality was until the 1970s).

    Hearing voices and seeing visions have been accepted or rejected differently by different societies over the ages and the border between ‘creative’ and ‘deviant’ isn’t just blurred, it’s always shifting. If you ask me it’s arbitrary.

    When I started working in the IT industry in the 80s it was almost a job pre-requisite to be eccentric and unreliable. Just so long as you could cut good code when you were capable of working at all. But by the late 90s you were expected to have a doctor’s certificate (and a diagnosis) if you took a week off work; and those 12 month gaps in my resume were considered A Bad Sign by potential employers. So I went from being weird to being sick.

    You’d know there’s no recognisable brain pathologies that separate the ‘mentally ill’ from everyone else Amy. There’s no physiological tests at all. And the symptomatological ones change with every revision of the DSM. It’s all just theories and fads with a big measure of moralising and no anchor in wetware at all.

    It’s not your brain or body making you mentally ill Amy. It’s your society. It’s stigma. It’s down to which differences are valued, which ones are tolerated and which ones have to be stamped out. Heck, in the old South there was even a mental illness for slaves who wanted to escape. I guess things haven’t really changed much.

    Oh, and my personality isn’t formed by “activity in my brain” either. It’s formed by my entire body, my entire society, my entire lived experience and the entire existence of my universe, from the land I stand on to the multitude of humans and pre-humans I descend from to the wonder of the night sky. And it’s formed by my activity. All of it. From the chemicals between my synapses to the chemicals ate for lunch to the chemicals I’ve shot up my arms. By my loves and hatreds and fears and delusions and ideals. By my work and play and social interactions and spiritual practice. And everything else.

    It’s not really about the organ between my ears. Any more than it’s about the organ between my legs. Psychiatrists tend to be too reductionist that way.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I was in agreement that the personality is formed by the environment. The environment affects how connections develop in the brain, I simply said it in a different way. If there is no brain there is no personality, as far as I can tell. You make some interesting points, but I think that we are in agreement for much, but we are all entitle to opinions. You might actually enjoy this video: https://youtu.be/FTtKpBGjxd8


      1. If there is no brain there is no personality, as far as I can tell.

        And if there’s no heart there’s no personality. Or if there’s no blood. Or no air we breathe …

        Everything is connected to everything else. The Buddhists call it “Indra’s Net”. In Auguries of Innocence Blake talks about seeing the world in a grain of sand.

        To observe that something connected to something else changes as a result of that connection is pretty unremarkable. And to imagine it as the final answer to “Why?” is to idolise the banal. They can only get away with it because at certain levels of analysis the brain appears incredibly complex. The god of the synaptic gaps.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. https://youtu.be/FTtKpBGjxd8

        Yeah, I know of some of Amen’s claims. And some of the debunking of them by clinicians, neurologists and philosophers. There’s been a lot of hyperbolic claims made by neuroimaging enthusiasts over the past 30 years or so but none of them have panned out in the sense of leading to reliable diagnoses or effective therapies.

        Yeah, treatments need to be different for different brains. Or different DNA. Or different endocrinology. Or different upbringings. Or different social networks. Or different fingerprints. Because they need to be different for different people.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: